Camera Order #118

Merged
tarmaciltur merged 5 commits from 17_camera_order into master 2026-05-23 15:06:54 -03:00
Owner

Save and load the order of the cameras

Save and load the order of the cameras
Window: Sort cameras by order
All checks were successful
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-init (push) Successful in 29s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-arm64 (push) Successful in 48s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-x86_64 (push) Successful in 3m36s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-bundle (push) Successful in 21s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-pages (push) Has been skipped
c981681774
tarmaciltur force-pushed 17_camera_order from c981681774
All checks were successful
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-init (push) Successful in 29s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-arm64 (push) Successful in 48s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-x86_64 (push) Successful in 3m36s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-bundle (push) Successful in 21s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-pages (push) Has been skipped
to 5e0686b2be
All checks were successful
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-init (push) Successful in 20s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-arm64 (push) Successful in 44s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-x86_64 (push) Successful in 3m36s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-bundle (push) Successful in 20s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-pages (push) Has been skipped
2026-05-16 10:24:26 -03:00
Compare

Looks great! But I also have some issues.

  • Maybe we can add some way to check the order values of other cameras. I think right now the user has to setup everything without any constraints. I not saying that it shouldn't be that way, it just I think we can think a solution for this.
  • I think the order row shouldn't be visible if there is only one camera configured.
Looks great! But I also have some issues. - Maybe we can add some way to check the order values of other cameras. I think right now the user has to setup everything without any constraints. I not saying that it shouldn't be that way, it just I think we can think a solution for this. - I think the order row shouldn't be visible if there is only one camera configured.
tarmaciltur changed title from Camera Order to WIP: Camera Order 2026-05-16 18:37:48 -03:00
tarmaciltur force-pushed 17_camera_order from 5e0686b2be
All checks were successful
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-init (push) Successful in 20s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-arm64 (push) Successful in 44s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-x86_64 (push) Successful in 3m36s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-bundle (push) Successful in 20s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-pages (push) Has been skipped
to 43672b6bba
All checks were successful
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-init (push) Successful in 20s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-arm64 (push) Successful in 1m7s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-x86_64 (push) Successful in 8m51s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-bundle (push) Successful in 21s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-pages (push) Has been skipped
2026-05-18 08:41:49 -03:00
Compare
tarmaciltur force-pushed 17_camera_order from 43672b6bba
All checks were successful
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-init (push) Successful in 20s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-arm64 (push) Successful in 1m7s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-x86_64 (push) Successful in 8m51s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-bundle (push) Successful in 21s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-pages (push) Has been skipped
to 8695ef4b16
All checks were successful
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-init (push) Successful in 23s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-arm64 (push) Successful in 1m10s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-builder-x86_64 (push) Successful in 10m41s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-bundle (push) Successful in 21s
Flatpak Build and Publish / flatpak-repo-pages (push) Has been skipped
2026-05-18 21:16:51 -03:00
Compare
Author
Owner

@ariktaurendil wrote in #118 (comment):

Looks great! But I also have some issues.

* Maybe we can add some way to check the order values of other cameras. I think right now the user has to setup everything without any constraints. I not saying that it shouldn't be that way, it just I think we can think a solution for this.

* I think the order row shouldn't be visible if there is only one camera configured.

Now the order is invisible when there is only one camera.

The order values check is somewhat complex and i'd rather implement it in other PR

@ariktaurendil wrote in https://softwareperonista.com.ar/p/vigilantear/pulls/118#issuecomment-1139: > Looks great! But I also have some issues. > > * Maybe we can add some way to check the order values of other cameras. I think right now the user has to setup everything without any constraints. I not saying that it shouldn't be that way, it just I think we can think a solution for this. > > * I think the order row shouldn't be visible if there is only one camera configured. Now the order is invisible when there is only one camera. The order values check is somewhat complex and i'd rather implement it in other PR
tarmaciltur changed title from WIP: Camera Order to Camera Order 2026-05-18 21:36:16 -03:00
ariktaurendil left a comment

LGTM

LGTM
tarmaciltur deleted branch 17_camera_order 2026-05-23 15:06:54 -03:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
p/vigilantear!118
No description provided.